INFURIATING: Patriot Coal Moves To Rob Miners & Families of Benefits

Unlikely Allies: Greens Join Coal Miners In ‘Patriot’ Coal Fight

Posted on The Daily Kos by Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins

by CECIL ROBERTS, President of United Mine Workers of America (UMWA); VAN JONES, President of Rebuild the Dream and a CNN contributor; and PHAEDRA ELLIS-LAMKINS, CEO of Green for All

You don’t often read headlines about environmentalists joining forces with coal miners. Environmentalists want to shut down coal plants that pollute our air and water, while miners understandably fight to keep and defend the jobs that the coal industry provides.  Between these two forces, there sometimes appears to be little common ground.

But the events leading up to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Patriot Coal are so outrageous that the seemingly impossible has occurred –  greens and coal miners are united in a common fight for fairness.

At issue: roughly 10,000 retired coal miners, 2,000 active miners and their families who may get the rug pulled out from under them by Patriot. As a result of an outrageous court filing earlier this month, the retirement health benefits they earned through years of service to their employers—Peabody Energy, Arch Coal, and Patriot Coal—may vanish into thin air.

Companies declare bankruptcy every day. But Patriot Coal’s bankruptcy is different. It appears to be part of a cynical plot by Peabody and Arch—a scheme choreographed to maximize profits at the expense of their own workers.

Peabody Energy and Arch Coal created the companies that became today’s Patriot Coal mainly for the purpose of shirking their obligations to coal miners, retirees and widows. Peabody and Arch used Patriot as a “dummy” vehicle to shed responsibility for retirement benefits they owed their employees, most  of whom are active and retired members of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA).

In other words: Patriot’s bankruptcy petition last year was not the result of a failed business plan. Bankruptcy WAS the business plan, all along. Now Chapter 11 may allow the company to slip out of its health care obligations to thousands of coal mining families, while shielding and maintaining the massive profits of Peabody Energy and Arch Coal.

If this is true, we are witnessing the calculated and brazen abuse of America’s bankruptcy process, for the sole purpose of cheating America’s most heroic workers: men and women who have already risked their lives, limbs and lungs to help keep the lights turned on in our country.

It is hard to imagine anything more unpatriotic than what Patriot Coal and its founding companies are doing. All of us should feel a moral obligation to demand that our leaders in government, in business, and in the court system protect these workers and their families.

Another sad irony: most who would be without healthcare never even worked for Patriot Coal. They had retired from Peabody and Arch before Patriot was created.

Consider the case of Joe T. Brown. For 32 years, he worked as a miner for a subsidiary of Peabody. Today, he suffers from black lung, which blocks 15 percent of his breathing capacity. In the years that Mr. Brown dedicated to the coal industry, he earned a good pension and lifelong healthcare. But now, as a result of Patriot’s bankruptcy, he is facing a bleak future without healthcare. If a person gives 30 back-breaking years of his life in service to a company, he should be able to retire securely. He should have the security of knowing that the company will hold up its end of the bargain and make good on the promises it made. He should be able to count on America’s courts to see the difference between a legitimate bankruptcy petition and a fraudulent Ponzi scheme.

This kind of misbehavior represents the worst of what American corporations can be.  But by working together to fight this injustice, environmentalists and coal miners may have an opportunity to  build bridges to address our mutual concerns and shared vision.

One of the major causes of contention between coal miners and greens has been resolving the difficult issue of jobs vs. protecting the environment.  But we don’t have to limit ourselves to picking one or the other.  Americans deserve good jobs, secure retirements and a healthy environment. We do not need to accept a false choice between our pressing economic needs and our legitimate environmental concerns.

The truth of the matter is, environmentalists and workers in our energy sector have more in common than we often acknowledge. We all want good jobs to feed our children – and a clean environment so that our kids, and our grand-kids, can thrive. We all want our kids and grandkids to breathe clean air and drink clean water and lead healthy, prosperous lives.

It’s that common vision that has driven our independent actions toward it. For years, the UMWA has worked to reduce emissions at American coal-fired power plants and has advocated for ways to encourage the same around the world. Similarly, environmentalists have called for a transition to a cleaner energy economy which also ensures that coal, oil, and gas workers and their families are protected, that the retirement benefits they have earned are secure, and that there will be opportunities for good jobs in a reinvented fossil fuel industry and an expanded renewable energy sector.

What we’ve done separately, it’s time to now do together.

It might not be easy to lead our nation toward good jobs and a healthy environment, but it is possible. And securing fairness for Patriot workers and retirees is a first step on the path to getting there.

ORIGINALLY POSTED TO PHAEDRA ELLIS-LAMKINS ON FRI APR 19, 2013 AT 10:00 AM PDT.

ALSO REPUBLISHED BY CLIMATE HAWKS AND IN SUPPORT OF LABOR AND UNIONS.

29

04 2013

Kim Wasserman, activist profiled in the film is honored!

Meet the woman who shut down Chicago’s dirty coal plants

By Claire Thompson

Kimberly Wasserman.

Kimberly Wasserman.

Last summer, clean-air activists celebrated theshutdown of Chicago’s notorious Fisk and Crawford coal power plants, which ended the Windy City’s distinction as the only U.S. metropolis to house two operating coal facilities. The victory came thanks to a dogged grassroots battle waged by residents of Little Village and Pilsen, the predominantly Latino, working-class neighborhoods bearing the brunt of the plants’ pollution. Today, the woman who spearheaded that battle, lifelong Little Village resident Kimberly Wasserman, becomes North America’s recipient of the Goldman Environmental Prize, one of the highest honors in the world for grassroots green activism.

Wasserman was 21 when her infant son suffered his first asthma attack. She had just started working for the Little Village Environmental Justice Organization (LVEJO), doing door-to-door surveys gauging neighbors’ environmental concerns, so she started asking around about asthma and respiratory issues, which turned out to be common problems in the community. Soon after, a Harvard School of Public Health study confirmed LVEJO’s suspicions that the coal plants might have something to do with the high rates of asthma in the neighborhood, and Wasserman started organizing.

We got a chance to talk with Wasserman about what it took to kick Big Coal to the curb.

Q. Tell me about what motivated you to take on this issue. How long had you lived in Little Village, and how aware were you of environmental health issues before?

A. I was born and raised in Little Village. I’ve lived here 32 out of the 36 years that I’ve been on this lovely planet. I didn’t know a whole lot about air quality or environmental issues before entering this job [at LVEJO]. [When] my baby was about two months old, he had his first asthma attack. I started focusing my door-to-door conversations to try to understand how many other people had family members with respiratory issues. We found that an alarming number of people in our neighborhood had asthma. So we started to look at, what is in our neighborhood? We found the coal power plants. A lot of folks didn’t know what they did there; the smoke was white and very unassuming, and so a lot of young people called it the cloud factory because they thought that’s where clouds came from.

It made us want to understand, well, how do you burn coal? The more we researched, we were surprised that our local government would allow such dirty and outdated technology. In 2000, Harvard School of Public Health released a study about coal power plants in Illinois, and the information about the Crawford and Fisk plant[s] was very astounding. There were over 3,000 asthma attacks, 1,500 emergency room visits, and 41 deaths a year attributed to these coal power plants. And then on top of that, we found out the coal power plant didn’t supply electricity to the city of Chicago or the state of Illinois.

Q. How did you share what you’d found out with the neighborhood and organize people to fight for change?

A. We shared this door-to-door. We had block meetings in which we would talk about what is asthma and how do you develop it and what are some of the contributing factors. [People aren’t] just dealing with a child or an adult or a senior with illness, they’re also having to miss work, people are missing school, and all those [things] have an impact on the community. People were upset when they found out that the city wasn’t willing to do anything about it. Why is it that our community is being sacrificed for the sake of making money for this industry? It was on us to make sure that we funneled that anger and resentment in a positive way.

At first we sent a letter to city hall and requested a meeting, and nobody wanted to talk to us. Our young people wanted to show what this meant in real life. So they did an action on the fifth floor of city hall, in front of former Mayor Daley’s office. Forty-one young people laid on the floor and zipped themselves up in body bags and put inhalers in their mouths. We got a phone call from the mayor’s media office that basically yelled at me and said, you embarrassed the mayor, this is not appropriate. And our response was, well, this coal power plant in our neighborhood is not appropriate. So we knew that we struck a chord.

Q. How did the culture and sense of community in Little Village contribute to your campaign?

Members of the Little Village Environmental Justice Organization.

Members of the Little Village Environmental Justice Organization.

A. A lot of what helped us was looking at the history of where our people come from. Taking the lessons we learned from both Mexican and Mexican-American history, and looking at movement building and murals and art and street theater, and how all of those things played into communication of a struggle and a solution — we tried to incorporate posters and art and murals. We did street theater; we held clean-power elections where we would have folks on one corner with wind and solar power, and on the other corner we had coal barons dressed to the nines in tuxedos. It helped us educate people in nontraditional ways, but ways that have been shown in our history and culture to be very effective.

Q. What was the turning point that led to your eventual success?

A. In creation of the [clean power coalition, a partnership with big green groups], we were able to leverage a lot of resources that organizations like ours don’t have. Greenpeace scaled the smokestack in Pilsen and camped there for two days, which is amazing because our community members are like, I can’t afford to get arrested, I have no papers.

The second thing was that Mayor Daley announced that he was retiring and would not be seeking reelection. The opportunity to make this part of the election campaign was instrumental. Every time there was a debate or an interview, we tried our best to get this issue included in that conversation. So when Rahm Emanuel won, we were able to hold him to his promise of saying if I win, I’m going to deal with the issue. A year into office he was like, all right, you guys have garnered enough support. He let [the coal plants] know what was happening and gave them 90 days [to either comply with required upgrades and lower their emissions or shut down]. Ninety days later they came back and said we’re going to voluntarily shut down.

Q. Mainstream green groups like the Sierra Club often get criticized for not working well with grassroots organizations. Why do you think that is? What was your experience building the clean power coalition?

A. Unfortunately I think a lot of it has to do with money and power. [Environmental justice] organizations get less than 5 percent of environmental funding out there. There has to be pushback on that, but there also has to be a conversation. When we came together as a coalition, one of the first things we did was have a conversation on power, on race, on class. It’s the communities of color that are being impacted [by climate change and pollution]. We created a memorandum of understanding to make sure that we as smaller organizations weren’t thrown under the bus, that we weren’t excluded from negotiations.

Luckily, both the Illinois chapter of the Sierra Club and the local Greenpeace office were willing to [agree]. I think the staff they have are young people who understand the privilege they come from and are willing to humble themselves enough to have these difficult conversations and find authentic ways to work together. That’s the reality of doing this work — you have to have these uncomfortable conversations.

Q. What are you tackling next, now that the coal plants have been shut down?

A. We have brownfield legacies in our community, and we don’t want another one. We don’t want to be looking at an abandoned coal power plant for the next 20 years. So we’re looking at the remediation and redevelopment of that.

While we were struggling to shut down the coal power plant for 12 years, we were also advocating for a new park to be built in our community. We won that victory as well last year. We’ve been working with the community to develop a design for the park, and make sure that adequate funding is given to this park, being that it’s going to be the first one built in our neighborhood in over 75 years.

And then the last thing that we’re working on is our public transit campaign. We find ourselves in a public-transit desert in our neighborhood. You have to go about a mile north to get the train; it used to go three miles south before you could find a bus. Last year, we won the installation of a new bus line in our neighborhood, so now we have a bus smack-dab in the middle of that three-mile gap. They only gave us a third of the full route we wanted, so we’re going to be advocating for the rest of the route until we get it.

Q. What’s your advice for other communities facing similar battles?

A. Definitely don’t give up. And definitely arm yourself with as much research as possible. There is tons of capacity in our communities to do research, to do surveys, to collect and analyze data. We have to be arming our young people to be thinking about careers in math and science and engineering to be able to bring those skills back and help us tackle some of these environmental-justice issues. When our campaign started, some of our young people were in first or second grade, and those young people are now in college, getting their masters in environmental justice, because this had such a resonating effect on them.

Read more about this year’s other Goldman winners here.

16

04 2013

Film Screening Nov.17 at Central MASS Film Festival in Worcester

Hey everyone, recently I’ve had the privilege of working with a bunch of terrific media-makers from Worcester to create a new film festival, the CENTRAL MASS FILM FESTIVAL. The full festival will take place sometime in the Spring of 2013, but in the meantime we’re having one-night “teaser” events to introduce the festival and ourselves to the Worcester and MA communities.

We’ve had one very successful “teaser” event so far and our second one is fast approaching!

THE DIRTY TRUTH ABOUT COAL will screen on November 17 at Cantina Bar & Grill, 385 Main Street, Worcester, MA as part of a evening focussing on environmental issues. Another film, AGROFUELS, about the negative side of biofuels, will also be screening. Both films are 30mins each. Check out the film festival’s website (above) for more info., as well as the poster below.

It’s going to be a GREAT event, and the panel will feature many local clean air and clean water activists including attorney SHANNA CLEVELAND, of Conservation Law Foundation who is the key interview in THE DIRTY TRUTH ABOUT COAL.

Hope to see you there!

Alexia

 

 

 

31

10 2012

Drought

“And he slept and dreamed the second time: and, behold, seven ears of corn came up upon one stalk, rank and good. And, behold, seven thin ears and blasted with the east wind sprung up after them. And the seven thin ears devoured the seven rank and full ears. And Pharaoh awoke, and, behold, it was a dream.” –King James Bible

The following link will take you to a heart-breaking photo essay in THE ATLANTIC magazine that shows the effects of this summer’s devastating drought. As most of us already know, the drought developed partly due to coal emissions-induced global warming.

We must help our farmers.

http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/08/the-drought-of-2012/100360/

29

08 2012

-Coal, +Fracking = BAD IDEA

I’ve been doing a lot of research for a follow up film to DTAC. The journey took me all over the internet, watching videos, reading studies, etc. Yesterday I saw Josh Fox’s GASLAND and had the hell officially scared right outta me. Fracking is the worst thing ever. Just EVER. In a nutshell-although I beg you to see this incredible movie-is that if tracking fluid, which is needed for the extraction of the natural gas and is REALLY REALLY TOXIC, gets into your groundwater, you’ll get really really sick INSTANTLY. This stuff won’t wait.

Anyway, I’m concerned with tracking now because I’m researching WV to see what can replace coal as an economic driver and energy source (but, truly, the economic driver is more important). Well, it turns out, as you can imagine, that natural gas is the resource du jour in Appalachia. Why? Because there’s a HUGE reserve of it underground trapped in a formation called the Marcellus Shale. Hundreds of people are already sick. This needs to stop NOW.

In connection with GASLAND, today, I watched LOW COAL, a 90-minute film about WV coal country that should be seen by all Americans. If we value our right to vote for whatever we want, we must understand that in our connected-and-interdependent society, our actions have consequences far away from our individual homes. What I mean by this is that we must all move against Hydraulic Fracturing (fracking), or Appalachia and all the Americans living in it-those profiled beautifully in LOW COAL-will be gone forever. You can watch LOW COAL for free on their website.

Let’s work together to try and transition coal country to an economy that won’t kill them. To quote the late coal miner’s daughter and clean energy activist, Judy Bonds: “There are no jobs on a dead planet.”

 

02

08 2012

Proposed Coal Plants Nationwide

This is a Google map created by The Sierra Club’s Environmental Law Program that shows the 200+ coal plants being proposed nationwide to date:

http://www.sierraclub.org/environmentallaw/coal/map/default.aspx

27

07 2012

Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis

When my brother and I were little, we looked up the longest word in the dictionary. At that time it was “pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis,” the scientific term for Black Lung. How odd  that almost 40 years later I would become obsessed with coal-fired energy production and it’s detrimental effects on public health.

Recently, NPR did a series of stories on a resurgence of Black Lung.

I encourage everyone to read these stories. We are all, every American, responsible for these miners’ lives, as they, in turn, are responsible for ours. The power rests in our voting for measures that promote alternative energy production that can replace coal-production so these folks and their future generations can evolve in health.

 

15

07 2012

“Exert intergenerational responsibility”

The quote in the title comes from the wonderful book on living better than sustainably, “CRADLE TO CRADLE,” by architect William McDonough and chemist Michael Braungart. This is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand the wider view we all need to adopt if we are to save ourselves and future generations.

The book ends by quoting Thomas Jefferson, and it is Jefferson’s quote that strikes me this morning. In a letter to James Madison, Jefferson writes: “The earth belongs…to the living… No man can by natural right oblige the lands he occupied, or the persons who succeeded him in that occupation, to the payment of debts contracted by him. For if he could, he might, during his own life, eat up the usufruct of the lands for several generations to come, and then the lands would belong to the dead, and not to the living.”

It’s the principle of seventh generation espoused by Native Americans, and says that we should act today so as to leave a prosperous Earth behind for our next generations. Such a message was never more necessary than it is now.

01

07 2012

Pause For Station Identification

The plight of any artist at, really, any time, is finding motivation to keep doing what we were put on this earth to do. I got a little nailed with “Why am I doing this????” angst in this last month, but I’m back now and ready to continue kicking ass.

The thing that helped me get out of my head this time was a fellow artist who was in worse shape with her debilitating lack of motivation. She asked for my help and we made a plan for her to work on one project tonight and have some kind of rough draft of it to show me tomorrow morning. As we were solidifying this agreement, however, I realized that it was a one-way street. SHE was working on something she had to show ME, but I wasn’t being asked to work on anything at all. This isn’t the most productive way to be. One sure way to get yourself out of a rut is to put up or shut up–I need to be under the same gun as she is or I won’t be able to give her good advice, so I’ve made a challenge of my own. I told her that I’ll do a similar “rough draft” of something related to the DIRTY TRUTH film and that I’ll show it to her tomorrow. She agreed.

I’ve been unemployed since Christmas, but this doesn’t mean my work can stop. Bill McKibben doesn’t get paid to write emails to the 350.org members, he just feels compelled to do it. He has a sense of a higher purpose. He feels that if he doesn’t do everything he can to make change, to wake people up about the real threat of devastating climate change that he won’t be able to live with himself. Well, if it’s not the same for me about clean air then I don’t know what the hell I’m doing here. So, here it is: I’m out of my head, and I’m working again–on the film–and I feel better. :)

To quote THE WEST WING “Sometimes we need breaks. Breaks are good. But here’s the thing: break’s over.”

26

06 2012

It’s The Jobs, Stupid (Glass Half Full)

Every day now I am reading at least one article about the decline of coal-derived energy, and while the environmentalist in me is doing a dance of joy, the humanitarian in me is freaking out about the jobs lost. Miners and coal-plant employees, and all the other folks along the economic chain of the coal industry are losing jobs and as more folks become educated about the horrific health effects of coal, the more jobs will be lost.

As anti-coal activists, we need to do something about this. We can’t just say “Your industry is killing you, your family, and everyone around you,” shut down the source of their livelihoods and walk away; we need to be ready with solutions. In the end, of course, having solutions in our back pockets will help with the anti-coal debate. All so-called “pro-coal” people in the lower tiers of the economic coal-chain want is to not lose their jobs. They have families they want to support. This country is rich in resources. Solutions DEFINITELY exist that can best accommodate the needs of the area where a coal plant is being shut down.

I am currently researching this question with friends I spoke with during the making of THE DIRTY TRUTH ABOUT COAL. Whatever we come up with I’ll post here, but this is something that really shouldn’t take that long to kick into gear. The answers are all at the site itself:

1. What is the best use for the site? How polluted is it?

2. Should the building (plant) be torn down or remodeled?

Once you look at these two things, the rest of the answers about how to move forward will fall into place. Research has to be done on all fronts, but such research could be looped into local schools’ education. Also, use the old plant to teach kids about the history of the coal industry and it’s role in the shaping of the region and the nation.

See? GLASS HALF FULL, Y’ALL!

DTAC FILM SCREENINGS UPDATE:

Drew Grand of Sierra Club Beyond Coal MA has organized three house parties in Western MA in June that will use the film to kick off discussion. THREE SCREENINGS IN ONE MONTH! That’s a MUCH better average than a good showing at a film festival!!! Photos will be taken at each event and a “screening report” will be written up and all sent to me so I can track the effectiveness of the film. I will add pix & reports to this blog as I get them!

 

31

05 2012